Ultimate PC

Is there any computer build that can run Crysis on max settings at around 1920 x 1200 and get 60 frames per second and if so what would the system specs be? Thanks. Ultimate PC
google.comUltimate PC
well

i think this should do it

CPU: Intel Core i7 965

GPU: 2x 4870X2's in Crossfire, or 3x GTX280's in Tri SLI or 2x GTX295's in Quad SLI

Mobo: EVGA X58

RAM: 6GB G Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 (1600Mhz, Triple Channel)

PSU: 1100W Thermaltake

Case: Thermaltake SwordM or any full tower you like

CPU Fan: Coolermaster V8 (i just like the name, XD)

Extra: DVD Drives and HDD's and some water cooling if you know how
[QUOTE=''cs45F'']google.com[/QUOTE]Google is the worst source for this type of question. I usually just find benchmarks of the game and none of them seem to be able to run the game that intense. I don't really care about running Crysis I just want to know what specs a computer would need to be able to handle such intense demands.I'm planning for a future build.
[QUOTE=''Lehman'']well i think this should do it CPU: Intel Core i7 965 GPU: 2x 4870X2's in Crossfire, or 3x GTX280's in Tri SLI or 2x GTX295's in Quad SLI Mobo: EVGA X58 RAM: 6GB G Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 (1600Mhz, Triple Channel) PSU: 1100W Thermaltake Case: Thermaltake SwordM or any full tower you like CPU Fan: Coolermaster V8 (i just like the name, XD) Extra: DVD Drives and HDD's and some water cooling if you know how[/QUOTE]Wow you almost hit the jackpot but its more of a 50sh with those specs at that resolution only with 3 GTX 280:http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-gaming,2061-7.html
Spending that much for one game isn't exactly practical TBH.



Besides crysis needs a lot of VRAM (i think), no gaming cards of this current generation can supply that much, even if crossdfired and SLI'd.



Thats why people haven't seen 60+ fps on super high resolutions with warhead.
[QUOTE=''-kaz3-'']Spending that much for one game isn't exactly practical TBH.[/QUOTE]I agree, I just want to know what would be needed for a system that powerful. Is your opinion that such technology doesn't exist yet?
[QUOTE=''SirusCoven'']I agree, I just want to know what would be needed for a system that powerful. Is your opinion that such technology doesn't exist yet? [/QUOTE]

The specs the above guy gave are the most powerful to date. And as the link i gave show they dont make it to 60 fps, they are close, but they just cant make it.
You should watch this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vQdrJCPsWF0%26feature=channel
No computer hardware can run Crysis on absolute maximum settings at 60fps. Scientists tried it with a CERN supercomputer. The supercomputer crashed after ten minutes. Plus... Crysis isn't by far the best game you could be playing, even if it does look pretty.
Wait for Lucid's Hydra chip. it shows linear scaling with multiple GPU's.

Meaning 2 gtx 280's will be 200% more powerful than one gtx280. Well, those are the initial reports. If it does what is advertised, you'd be seeing much better multi-GPU gaming.
[QUOTE=''Lehman'']well i think this should do it CPU: Intel Core i7 965 GPU: 2x 4870X2's in Crossfire, or 3x GTX280's in Tri SLI or 2x GTX295's in Quad SLI Mobo: EVGA X58 RAM: 6GB G Skill DDR3 PC3-12800 (1600Mhz, Triple Channel) PSU: 1100W Thermaltake Case: Thermaltake SwordM or any full tower you like CPU Fan: Coolermaster V8 (i just like the name, XD) Extra: DVD Drives and HDD's and some water cooling if you know how[/QUOTE]You got the GPU suggestion all wrong. 2 280 GTX outperforms 2 4870x2 by quite a lot in Crysis, and is cheaper.If you are a good overclocker and get a very good cpu cooler you can get a 920 instead, and just overclock it to the 3.6-3.8 range and you'll be able to run crysis at max settings at this resolution
[QUOTE=''-kaz3-'']Wait for Lucid's Hydra chip. it shows linear scaling with multiple GPU's. Meaning 2 gtx 280's will be 200% more powerful than one gtx280. Well, those are the initial reports. If it does what is advertised, you'd be seeing much better multi-GPU gaming.[/QUOTE]That is the theoretical gain, are there any benchmarks yet anyway, and do we know a release date?
This 'no computer can run it' is just BS. Its all down to how much you pay. Get an overclocked 3.2Ghz quad core processor, with 3 GTX 280's in SLI or 2 4870x2, in Crossfire, 8GB of RAM, and you will easily be able to run Crysis on Max settings at 1920x1200.
Look at thishttp://www.bjorn3d.com/read.php?cID=1403%26pageID=5741 And you can always expect a few more fps than the reference benchmark if you keep your pc optimized
[QUOTE=''SirusCoven''][QUOTE=''-kaz3-'']Spending that much for one game isn't exactly practical TBH.[/QUOTE]I agree, I just want to know what would be needed for a system that powerful. Is your opinion that such technology doesn't exist yet? [/QUOTE]

It's poissible to do it the question is is weather it's ecoonimical.

If you had all the money in the world you could just get ATI or Nvidia to design you a custom made card quite quickly, you could make it so every pixel on the screen had it's own 280gtx (though you would need a few processors just to manage the cards). The technology exists it's just not economical to do so, that's why the 2900XTX was nwever made, it had insane specs that were all feasable but it would cost far too much to create to turn a profit.